The ownership-lane view keeps final accountability readable instead of hiding owner drift behind more committee motion.
| Owner | Audience | Action | Ownership theme | Handoffs | Unresolved owners | Board confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief AI Officer | Board risk committee | RESET_OWNER | AI approvals are moving fast enough to matter, but final accountability is still rotating between policy, security, and product. | 5 | 2 | 62 |
| Chief Information Security Officer | Audit committee | CLARIFY_APPROVER | Identity exceptions are well known, but the last approver is still unclear whenever audit and security disagree. | 4 | 3 | 54 |
| Chief Revenue Officer | Board finance committee | COLLAPSE_HANDOFF | Revenue disputes are not lacking dashboards; they are lacking a short owner path that survives forecast pressure. | 5 | 1 | 50 |
| Chief Financial Officer | Investment committee | PAUSE_SCOPE | Capital-sensitive lanes are accumulating too many decision owners to expand safely. | 6 | 3 | 46 |
| Chief Commercial Officer | Board growth committee | RESET_OWNER | Procurement is cleaner than most lanes and can provide the reference ownership model. | 2 | 0 | 82 |
| Quality systems lead | Board compliance committee | RESET_OWNER | Regulated lanes still hand packets between quality, compliance, and operations without one durable final owner. | 5 | 2 | 52 |